9/11. Terrorism or Government Sabotage?

On the same day that two planes crashed into world trade centers, another plane was reported as crashing into the Pentagon, devouring part of the newly renovated intelligence building, and taking the lives of 125 souls. Officially, it is believed that hijackers hit the Pentagon; and yet, despite clear evidence of plane debris found at the site, and eyewitnesses watching the plane crash, there are those that believe that there was no plane crash at the Pentagon. Their claims are many, from a missile strike to a bomb within the Pentagon going off. Here you will see that claims that the Pentagon was by anything other than a Boeing 757 on 9/11 are false, based upon eyewitness testimony, physical evidence of a low flying plane, and plane debris found at the sight. In my search for the truth, I came upon a blog article by a man by the name of Craig McKee, an award winning journalist from Canada, who has been writing for 23 years. In his article "How We Know An Airliner Did not Hit the...

In the fight between conspiracy theorists and those that believe the official story of the 9/11, there is one theory that has been raging since the beginning over whether or not the World Trade Centers' collapse was caused by the planes, or by a controlled demolition. In my research, I've uncovered the truth, that it was not a controlled demolition, but rather, raging fires and structure damage are what caused the trade centers to fall. In this blog post, I'll be deconstructing the articles of both sides and showing just how Popular Mechanics made the more convincing argument for the truth. The Popular Mechanics article, titled "Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report-the World Trade Center" is part of a larger report debunking a number of myths from 9/11. In this part of the report, however, it focuses heavily on the World Trade Centers, including the North and South Tower, and WTC 7. In the article, it takes on five different conspiracies associated with th...